Ok, so I noticed that Obama was more aggressive and did seem more confident than the first debate. This debate was a bit more juicy than the first, but I still felt like they both made fools of themselves a bit. "This great country..." shut up please...
I feel like many times neither candidate actually answered the questions being asked. They skirted around direct answers and gave more vague solutions. That's what people refer to as rhetoric...empty words...Romney even used it against Obama at first.
I'm glad the moderator tried a bit harder to move the debaters along...
I like what you said about both candidates being vague, because it's true. I don't mean to point fingers, but if Romney were more open about his tax plans then, I think, Obama would have been more accurate as well.
ReplyDeleteThat's politics, right? Being just vague enough to not put a bad taste in a swing voter's mouth, but still making them happy. It's really one of the things I dislike most about politics, who knows if it will ever change.